From 885fea1bd35d17ef4c4d5d75ffc6ac5c4df09e30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kumar Damani <me@kumardamani.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:10:54 -0500
Subject: build updates

---
 public/post/programming-as-art/index.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/public/post/programming-as-art/index.html b/public/post/programming-as-art/index.html
index 5505e50..7303817 100644
--- a/public/post/programming-as-art/index.html
+++ b/public/post/programming-as-art/index.html
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ sum of 1 to 100. Of course, it was a natural application of what we had just don
 </span></span></code></pre></div><p>Sure enough we saw the answer <code>5050</code> in the console.
 But then the TA reminds us that we are making our computers <strong>work too hard</strong>.
 In other words, the computer needs to do one-hundred ADD instructions in order to make this computation happen.</p>
-<p>What if it the number was a million? How well would our method scale?</p>
+<p>What if the number was a million? How well would our method scale?</p>
 <p>Well then it would take a million ADD instructions.
 We call this scaling <em>linearly</em> with the input size.
 Later we would formalize this to $\mathcal{O}(n)$ (pronounced: <em>Big Oh of N</em>).</p>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3