1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title></title>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='style.css'>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Why do I <a href="https://wiki.r-selfhosted.com/getting-started/what-is-self-hosting/">self-host</a>?</h1>
<h2>Digital freedom/independence</h2>
<p>To put it simply, I do not want to depend on the existence of corp. X for data that is important to me.
Many things could happen to corp. X such that your data could become inaccessible or worse:
<ul>
<li>Corp. X could vanish/close/"declare backruptcy" (as with many cryto corps. lately).</li>
<li>Corp. X could make a policy change and lock you out.</li>
<li>You could forget to pay the bills a few times and get locked out.</li>
<li>Corp. X could get hacked, and ransomed for data. This is the new fad!</li>
</ul>
I have a lifetime's worth of file, photos, media, passwords etc. and I 💤 much better at night knowing
I am avoiding most if not all of the risks above.
</p>
<h2 id="privacy">Privacy at the population level</h2>
<p>I am often asked some variation of:
<ul>
<li>
<em>"Why do I care if corp. X has my data? I have nothing to hide!"</em>
</li>
<li>
<em>"Since I'm aware of targeted advertising, it won't work on me,
so why should I care if corp. X has my data?"</em>
</li>
</ul>
</p>
<dl>
<dt>
To such questions, I would pose the counter question:
</dt>
<br>
<dd>
<strong> Do we have a moral responsibily to ensure we leave the world in a better state than we inherit,
or the very least, not in a worse state?</strong>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>
If your answer is <em>no</em>, then no need to read further, the following will not change your mind.
</p>
<dl>
<dt>
If your answer is <em>yes</em>, but you aren't convinced that these are related,
then the <em>argument goes something like this...</em>
</dt>
<br>
<dd>
We live in a world of mass data collection/survailence. <br>
This enables corp. X to use ML (Machine Learning) techniques to build/train AI (Artificial Intelligence)
models that aim to predict human behaviour. <br>
That in and of itself is not my cause for concern here. <br>
The problems arise when corp. X use these techniques for profit
without regard for the harm they cause at a <em>population level</em> (intentionally or not). <br>
I have unfortunately lived through enough of these cases to be able to cite a few recent examples of this:
</dd>
<br>
<dd>
Instagram (etc.) designs its apps/products based on user behaviour data
to keep its userbase on its platform for as long as possible [0].
You might think you are "too smart" to fall for these tricks, and you may be right,
but what about the millions of boys, and girls who aren't as wise as you?
Do they deserve to suffer from mental health, body image, confidence issues for the rest of their lives?
</dd>
<br>
<dd>
You could say "well thats due to bad parenting", but the point remains that
more and more of the digital world is having <em>real world</em> negative consequences regardless of
your individual participation level. For example:
</dd>
<br>
<dd>
It is well documented that Facebook's (etc.) targetted advertising
played a significant a role in the 2016 US elections [1].
Many of the policies implemented during this time has real world consequences to millions
of people potentially for many generations.
<em>This affects us all.</em>
Even if we don't have/use Facebook, we (most of us) cannot <em>opt out</em> of policy changes.
</dd>
</dl>
<p>
To summarize, it might not be a problem if individuals disregard their
privacy at the individual level, but in aggregate, a <em>population-wide</em> disregard
has dystopian consequences.
(This is also the primary reason I refuse to participate in social media.)
</p>
<dl>
<dt>
So the question you have to ask yourself is...
</dt>
<br>
<dd>
<strong>Do I want to contribute to a dystopian (<a
href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orwellian">Orwellian</a>) future?</strong>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>
If your answer is <em>yes</em>, then continue to live as you are.
</p>
<p>
If your answer is <em>no</em>, than we must put an end to mass data-collection by
not voluntarily giving our data to corp. X, and finally acknowledging the value of our privacy.
Fortunately, there are a few ways you can <em>say no!</em>
<ul>
<li>
<strong>Limit your exposure to these services.</strong> If a friend stops talking to you because
of this, then congratulations, you've just gotten rid of a fake friend. You're welcome.
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://wiki.r-selfhosted.com/getting-started/what-is-self-hosting/">Self-host</a>
as much as you can.
You can see how I <a href="https://gitlab.com/kdam0/vps">implement</a> this and replicate it yourself,
though it is a bit involved for normies.
</li>
<li>
If neither of the above work for you, then you'll need to do some research to
find an alternative source that you can trust isn't doing the same thing.
Use <a href="https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted">this</a>
as a starting point and try to search (Ctrl+f) for your service. For eg. Twitter, and
Instagram both have popular options available.
</li>
</ul>
</p>
<br>
<big>
<img src="pix/kumarsmall.gif" alt="Kumar pix">
<a href="index.html">Return to main page</a></big>
</body>
</html>
|
